Monday, March 7, 2011
Arts Education Conference
Look who's talking...

by Benjamin Zephaniah
I waz whitemailed
By a white witch,
Wid white magic
An white lies,
Branded by a white sheep
I slaved as a whitesmith
Near a white spot
Where I suffered whitewater fever.
Whitelisted as a whiteleg
I waz in de white book
As a master of white art,
It waz like white death.
People called me white jack
Some hailed me as a white wog,
So I joined de white watch
Trained as a white guard
Lived off the white economy.
Caught and beaten by de whiteshirts
I waz condemned to a white mass,
Don't worry, I shall be writing to de Black House
(republished from his official website)
Eternal Companion

Like the thousands at the India Art Summit, I too was looking for my ‘moment of connection’ amongst those innumerable pieces of art, that kept passing me by, and as I kept passing by them. And when I found it, it hit me, forcing me reconnect with my own cultural self and its connection with themythologically revered Indian Cow.The work was titled, ‘Eternal Companion’ and the Singapore based artist was P.Gnana.
The simplicity of the work hit me the most, and left me marvelingat the seemingly deep bond the artist seem to share with Cows. As an Indian, my mind traversed the holy associations with the Cow, and their symbolic value. But ‘Eternal Companion’ was an interesting depiction of these holy cows and their connection and life on Earth as companions to Humans.
The paintings by themselves were rich with bold colourls, but were juxtaposed with the bony outline of the Cows, their melancholic eyes, that reflected the miles of misery on the Earth. The Cows and the human figures were depicted entwined in an embrace that left me wondering how natural this relationship seemed, and how far we have left it behind in real terms. Gnana, to my mind was attempting a perfect balance and an eternal bond between the two in an attempt to capture what seemed like an eternal moment of connection amidst unending misery of life on earth.
Analysis of a Painting by Caravaggio: Judith beheading Holofernes

Indian mythologies have always seen stories with similar moral told in varied manner; be it the Naagdaman by Shri Krishna, the death of King Harinyakashyap by Narsimha or the killing of Ravana by Lord Ram- all explaining the victory of truth over evil. It is all the more captivating to see a heroic character deceiving his enemy by tactful methods like Lord Krishna in Mahabharata or Lord Vishnu in the incarnation of Mohini misleading the Danavas during the Samundra Manthan.
Interestingly a similar connection is seen in a Baroque style painting of Caravaggio called Judith beheading Holofernes. The very comely and rich widow Judith, had put off her mourning clothes, dressed herself in the finest garments and entered the enemy camp in order to rescue her people. The Assyrian army, led by Holofernes, stood in arms before the city of Bethulia. The Jews had lost heart, were on the point of giving up, and yet this woman set out on her own to seduce the enemy. After her bloody deed, the enemy soldiers fled in panic; Israel was saved and Judith returned triumphantly from the libertine’s tent. This characteristic of Judith is similar to that of the Mohini as she distracted the Asuras took the Amrita, and distributed it among the Devas, who drank it.
Caravaggio has painted the precise moment in which Holofernes is beheaded. His eyes have yet not grown dim in death, but are staring out of his head, full of mortal fear, and his mouth is wrenched open in a scream. The victim is still alive, his head only half – severed from his body. Caravaggio sought to capture the moment of shock and horror. The King Harinyakashyap got killed by yet another incarnation of Lord Vishnu called the Narsinhma wherein the Lord used his nails to kill him as the King would not be killed by weapons. It was a slow death, with prolonged pain, open eyes filled with horror prominently seen on the countenance. In Caravaggio’s painting, Judith’s features betray neither triumph nor passion, but determination and disgust. She lays the defenceless man without using force, keeping as great a distance as possible between her victim and herself unlike the Narsimha who puts him on his thighs (neither on earth or sky and kills him.
Swords, daggers and knives may be seen in almost all Caravaggio’s paintings. Like blood and decapitation, they constitute a kind of sadistic approach in his work. The paintings of Caravaggio expressed a natural vision. Nor does this demure heroine appear in a magnificent Baroque gown, but in the best clothes of the woman of the people. In doing so, he suppressed neither the furrows nor lines on a face nor the wrinkle produced by a life of toil on the hands of an old woman. It was just “too natural “as said by an artist namely Annibale Carracci could say about his contemporary’s painting of Judith. Figures, accentuated by artificial, almost subterranean lighting effects, standing out against a dark, nocturnal background became a characteristic of his work.
house as home: revisiting the place and space
Friend
Notes from the Bansari
It was the opening of an exhibition of an internationally prominent and senior Indian artist at a popular gallery in our city. The artist had displayed his recent cubism inspired, female figures. In the pristine white gallery space there were small circles of many known faces of the city, busy discussing the paintings on display and also each other. A high profile event it being, the organisers had set up a seven-star hotel’s stall to serve samosas and chaa. To add more colour to the grandiose of event in the court flanking the gallery, a ravanhatta and bansari were being played by two men-attired to be from rajasthan. This is the first time I met Jagdish Bhai, playing melodious tunes from the bansari. And inside outside-on display was an ironical comparison.
Both Jagdish bhai and the artist were almost of the same age, late 60s. The artist was inside the gallery, being well hailed at; while Jagdish Bhai played away in the corner of the court outside. The artist just had had a discussion with me on the pains of an artist to produce art and how irresponsibly the media represented both the art and the artist, while irrespective of the questions I asked, Jagdish bhai had begun a spontaneous conversation about the maya of this sansar. There were turns to congratulate the artist or to be introduced to him, while Jagdish bhai was easily passed by- reduced as a background score for the whole high profile event. But why I remembered Jagdish Bhai for a long time, even after that event, was the warmth, comfort and content his tunes played. So enthralled were a bunch of us by his music, we expressed him our joy, to which he smiled and replied, “Main uski den se ek kalakar hu!” (I am an artist because of his blessings) And so curious was I, that I had decided to meet him again.
The next time I met Jagdish bhai at his house in Gulbai Tekra-where the community of Solankis from Sarala in Marwar have settled around 150 years back. Jagdish Solanki born and brought up here showed no trappings of modernity of the city which surrounded him. Interestingly he was a government driver before he gave up his job for the love of the flute 40 years back. “I began learning practising folk songs from our Rajasthan and a few filmi songs.” He now plays at bhajans and functions. Sometimes he goes to Delhi and Mumbai to play. Also for the Jain monks at their utarans i.e. the temporary stops on their pilgrimage routes. His father and grandfather were dari-makers. “There wasn’t a fixed occupation. We were nomads who decided to settle.” He shared a dramatic story of how the Solankis decided to move away from Rajasthan to escape the tyrannical rule a feudal king before he had begun talking about the workings of the world-displaying highly philosophical and liberal views.
Of his seven children only his elder son has inherited his love of playing the flute. Two of his other sons are sculptors and artists who make traditional murals on the walls. Recently one of his son who was approached by a UK based organisation for some work in London, was denied help to go abroad, for reasons of being an illiterate. Then the family collectively decided to educate the grandchildren. However he wants them to be kalakars. What about clichéd desires engineering or medicine? Amused, they laughed a no.
“..it is like the fish and the bird. You remove the fish from the water to live in air, it will die. So will the bird die in the water. Each can survive only in their worlds. One cannot live in the world of the other.” Jagdish Bhai told me in one our meetings. Were these thoughts a consolation or the cause of the existence?
Jagdish Bhai is just one of the many stories of people who are anonymous folk artists, lost in economic and caste crutches. What would be art in stories of such ironies? An artist in his x by y studio, moulding with paints and clay with great effort an abstract meaning into reality versus the man who engages with a musical object like a bansari creating something as abstract as music –everyday everywhere. The artist who reveres the art on a pedestal, only to viewed and touched by a select few versus the notes of the bansariwala constantly modulating and being familiar to the streets around Gulbai Tekra. One was displayed in the ‘privileged’ space of a gallery versus while the other person’s notes were played, forgotten outside the gallery.